问题描述：
英语翻译
Only further research can reveal their full empirical power;
yet existing studies-from explanations of the democratic peace toendogenous tariff theory to theories relating domestic institutions and ideasto foreign policy-suggest
considerable promise.Third,a liberal theory of state preferences is themost fundamental
type of IR theory.Hypotheses that endogenize changes in state preferences
deserve equal treatment in monocausal explanations and analytical priorityin multicausal
ones,because liberal theory defines the theoretical and empirical domainsin
which it is appropriate even to consider realist and institutionalistclaims.Thus those
who ignore liberal theory do not simply sacrifice comprehensiveness; theyundermine
valid empirical evaluation of their own theories.Only by building onthese
three conclusions can liberals and their critics supplant debates overlabels with
debates over data.
We have seen that even monocausal
empirical tests of realist and institutionalist theories must control reliably for variation
in underlying preferences (not just strategies) of states.This requires precisely
the same detailed research into domestic politics.Such a baseline control is,moreover,
most reliable where backed by an explicit and generalizable theory of domestic
preference formation,that is,a liberal theory.In short,research into domestic preference
formation is unavoidable.
Only further research can reveal their full empirical power;
yet existing studies-from explanations of the democratic peace toendogenous tariff theory to theories relating domestic institutions and ideasto foreign policy-suggest
considerable promise.Third,a liberal theory of state preferences is themost fundamental
type of IR theory.Hypotheses that endogenize changes in state preferences
deserve equal treatment in monocausal explanations and analytical priorityin multicausal
ones,because liberal theory defines the theoretical and empirical domainsin
which it is appropriate even to consider realist and institutionalistclaims.Thus those
who ignore liberal theory do not simply sacrifice comprehensiveness; theyundermine
valid empirical evaluation of their own theories.Only by building onthese
three conclusions can liberals and their critics supplant debates overlabels with
debates over data.
We have seen that even monocausal
empirical tests of realist and institutionalist theories must control reliably for variation
in underlying preferences (not just strategies) of states.This requires precisely
the same detailed research into domestic politics.Such a baseline control is,moreover,
most reliable where backed by an explicit and generalizable theory of domestic
preference formation,that is,a liberal theory.In short,research into domestic preference
formation is unavoidable.
问题解答：
我来补答展开全文阅读