问题描述:
关于同位语从句的问题
eg.The reason why he was chosen remains unknown.这句显然是同位语从句
eg.The reasons why he decided to quit his job were many and various.这句同上面结构是一样的,但是我怎么从语意上就无法把它作为同位语从句来理解呢?难道是关系副词引导的定从?
我不理解q1240534250同学的说法,在于第一句“The reason why he was chosen remains unknown”实为定语从句,那么修饰抽象名词就不是同位语的专利了,
我之所以对这个句子疑惑,在于一般同位语从句一般都与抽象名词同位,一般没有复数形式。但第二句偏偏给了我一巴掌。虽然我也知道reasons和why在句子中不作成分,可是无法从语意上把它们区别开,
eg.The reason why he was chosen remains unknown.这句显然是同位语从句
eg.The reasons why he decided to quit his job were many and various.这句同上面结构是一样的,但是我怎么从语意上就无法把它作为同位语从句来理解呢?难道是关系副词引导的定从?
我不理解q1240534250同学的说法,在于第一句“The reason why he was chosen remains unknown”实为定语从句,那么修饰抽象名词就不是同位语的专利了,
我之所以对这个句子疑惑,在于一般同位语从句一般都与抽象名词同位,一般没有复数形式。但第二句偏偏给了我一巴掌。虽然我也知道reasons和why在句子中不作成分,可是无法从语意上把它们区别开,
问题解答:
我来补答展开全文阅读