问题描述：
英语翻译
.We should note,however,that extensive efforts at clarification and precision in the terms used in design may often be misplaced;especially if that clarification is directed to a reduction of the possible terms of reference for any set of actions,rather than to the clarifying of parts and the developing,in a structured way ,of multiple frames of reference.What is more likely called for is a greater participation in the language game itself—shared experiences that can serve as useful references for both designers and newcomers.Concrete means must be devised through which new domains of concern can enter into the designer’s consciousness,and useful analogs must be devised that allow newcomers to develop the capacity for multiple vision without being bound only to those possibilities that the designer has learned to imagine and refer to .The construction of useful references is a primary purpose of the university and a necessity for the field.Fortunately,much has happened in recent years that makes real progress in this regard,albeit in various ways,ranging form the study of typologies on the one hand,to the publication,for instance,of Alexander’s A Pattern Language.
This brings us to the central question.Does design have to do with mobilizing established formulas,or is it acting out internally programmed pattern of response to stimuli present in thr design situation.Or is it instead a form of sustained inquiry; or is it some of each and then more?How does our model of teaching and the realm of discourse in which it exists address these various conceptions of the design process?
只会用翻译工具的就不要回答了,得通顺,正确
.We should note,however,that extensive efforts at clarification and precision in the terms used in design may often be misplaced;especially if that clarification is directed to a reduction of the possible terms of reference for any set of actions,rather than to the clarifying of parts and the developing,in a structured way ,of multiple frames of reference.What is more likely called for is a greater participation in the language game itself—shared experiences that can serve as useful references for both designers and newcomers.Concrete means must be devised through which new domains of concern can enter into the designer’s consciousness,and useful analogs must be devised that allow newcomers to develop the capacity for multiple vision without being bound only to those possibilities that the designer has learned to imagine and refer to .The construction of useful references is a primary purpose of the university and a necessity for the field.Fortunately,much has happened in recent years that makes real progress in this regard,albeit in various ways,ranging form the study of typologies on the one hand,to the publication,for instance,of Alexander’s A Pattern Language.
This brings us to the central question.Does design have to do with mobilizing established formulas,or is it acting out internally programmed pattern of response to stimuli present in thr design situation.Or is it instead a form of sustained inquiry; or is it some of each and then more?How does our model of teaching and the realm of discourse in which it exists address these various conceptions of the design process?
只会用翻译工具的就不要回答了,得通顺,正确
问题解答：
我来补答展开全文阅读