培根《论读书》解析主题,内容,结构,培根态度,及个人看法,中英文都要,

STUDIES serve for delight, for ornament, and for ability. Their chief use for delight, is in privateness and retiring; for ornament, is in discourse; and for ability, is in the judgment, and disposition of business. For expert men can execute, and perhaps judge of particulars, one by one; but the general counsels, and the plots and marshalling of affairs, come best, from those that are learned. To spend too much time in studies is sloth; to use them too much for ornament, is affectation; to make judgment wholly by their rules, is the humor of a scholar. They perfect nature, and are perfected by experience: for natural abilities are like natural plants, that need proyning, by study; and studies themselves, do give forth directions too much at large, except they be bounded in by experience. Crafty men contemn studies, simple men admire them, and wise men use them; for they teach not their own use; but that is a wisdom without them, and above them, won by observation. Read not to contradict and confute; nor to believe and take for granted; nor to find talk and discourse; but to weigh and consider. Some books are to be tasted, others to be swallowed, and some few to be chewed and digested; that is, some books are to be read only in parts; others to be read, but not curiously; and some few to be read wholly, and with diligence and attention. Some books also may be read by deputy, and extracts made of them bothers; but that would be only in the less important arguments, and the meaner sort of books, else distilled books are like common distilled waters, flashy things.
Reading make a full man; conference a ready man; and writing an exact man. And therefore, if a man write little, he had need have a great memory; if he confer little, he had need have a present wit: and if he read little, he had need have much cunning, to seem to know, that he doth not. Histories make men wise; poets witty; the mathematics subtitle; natural philosophy deep; moral grave; logic and rhetoric able to contend. Abeunt studia in mores. Nay, there is no stand or impediment in the wit, but may be wrought out by fit studies; like as diseases of the body, may have appropriate exercises. Bowling is good for the stone and reins; shooting for the lungs and breast; gentle walking for the stomach; riding for the head; and the like. So if a man\'s wit be wandering, let him study the mathematics; for in demonstrations, if his wit be called away never so little, he must begin again. If his wit be not apt to distinguish or find differences, let him study the Schoolmen; for they are cymini sectors. If he be not apt to beat over matters, and to call up one thing to prove and illustrate another, let him study the lawyers' cases. So every defect of the mind, may have a special receipt.
译文
中文版：读书足以怡情,足以傅彩,足以长才.其怡情也,最见于独处幽居之时；其傅彩也,最见于高谈阔论之中；其长才也,最见于处世判事之际.练达之士虽能分别处理细事或一一判别枝节,然纵观统筹、全局策划,则舍好学深思者莫属.读书费时过多易惰,文采藻饰太盛则矫,全凭条文断事乃学究故态.读书补天然之不足,经验又补读书之不足,盖天生才干犹如自然花草,读书然后知如何修剪移接；而书中所示,如不以经验范之,则又大而无当.有一技之长者鄙读书,无知者羡读书,唯明智之士用读书,然书并不以用处告人,用书之智不在书中,而在书外,全凭观察得之.读书时不可存心诘难作者,不可尽信书上所言,亦不可只为寻章摘句,而应推敲细思.书有可浅尝者,有可吞食者,少数则须咀嚼消化.换言之,有只须读其部分者,有只须大体涉猎者,少数则须全读,读时须全神贯注,孜孜不倦.书亦可请人代读,取其所作摘要,但只限题材较次或价值不高者,否则书经提炼犹如水经蒸馏、淡而无味矣.（ 译者：王佐良）
读书使人充实,讨论使人机智,笔记使人准确.因此不常作笔记者须记忆特强,不常讨论者须天生聪颖,不常读书者须欺世有术,始能无知而显有知.读史使人明智,读诗使人灵秀,数学使人周密,科学使人深刻,伦理学使人庄重,逻辑修辞之学使人善辩：凡有所学,皆成性格.人之才智但有滞碍,无不可读适当之书使之顺畅,一如身体百病,皆可借相宜之运动除之.滚球利睾肾,射箭利胸肺,慢步利肠胃,骑术利头脑,诸如此类.如智力不集中,可令读数学,盖演题须全神贯注,稍有分散即须重演；如不能辨异,可令读经院哲学,盖是辈皆吹毛求疵之人；如不善求同,不善以一物阐证另一物,可令读律师之案卷.如此头脑中凡有缺陷,皆有特药可医.
分集剧情
分集查询
普通话
　　读书可以作为消遣,可以作为装饰,也可以增长才干.
　　
　　
　　孤独寂寞时,阅读可以消遣.高谈阔论时,知识可供装饰.处世行事时,知识意味着才干.懂得事务因果的人是幸运的.有实际经验的人虽能够处理个别性的事务,但若要综观整体,运筹全局,却唯有学识方能办到.
　　
　　
　　读书太慢的人驰惰,为装潢而读书是欺人,完全按照书本做事就是呆子.
　　
　　
　　求知可以改进人性,而经验又可以改进知识本身.人的天性犹如野生的花草,求知学习好比修剪移栽.学问虽能指引方向,但往往流于浅泛,必须依靠经验才能扎下根基.
　　
　　
　　狡诈者轻鄙学问,愚鲁者羡慕学问,聪明者则运用学问.知识本身并没有告诉人怎样运用它,运用的智慧在于书本之外.这是技艺,不体验就学不到.
　　
　　
　　读书的目的是为了认识事物原理.为挑剔辩驳去读书是无聊的.但也不可过于迷信书本.求知的目的不是为了吹嘘炫耀,而应该是为了寻找真理,启迪智慧.
　　
　　
　　书籍好比食品.有些只须浅尝,有些可以吞咽,只有少数需要仔细咀嚼,慢慢品味.所以,有的书只要读其中一部分,有的书只须知其梗概,而对于少数好书,则应当通读,细读,反复读.
　　
　　
　　有的书可以请人代读,然后看他的笔记摘要就行了.但这只应限于不太重要的议论和质量粗劣的书.否则一本书将像已被蒸馏过的水,变得淡而无味了.
　　
　　
　　读书使人充实,讨论使人机敏,写作则能使人精确.
　　
　　
　　因此,如果有人不读书又想冒充博学多知,他就必须很狡黠,才能掩人耳目.如果一个人懒于动笔,他的记忆力就必须强而可靠.如果一个人要孤独探索,他的头脑就必须格外锐利.
　　
　　
　　读史使人明智,读诗使人聪慧,学习数学使人精密,物理学使人深刻,伦理学使人高尚,逻辑修辞使人善辩.总之,“知识能塑造人的性格”.
　　
　　
　　不仅如此,精神上的各种缺陷,都可以通过求知来改善——正如身体上的缺陷,可能通过适当的运动来改善一样.例如打球有利于腰背,射箭可扩胸利肺,散步则有助于消化,骑术使人反应敏捷,等等.同样道理,一个思维不集中的人,他可以研习数学,因为数学稍不仔细就会出错.缺乏分析判断的人,他可以研习而上学,因为这门学问最讲究细琐的辩证.不善于推理的人,可以研习法律案例.如此等等.这种心灵上的缺陷,都可以通过学习而得到改善.
3相关评论
在读书的意义和作用方面培根有十分精辟的论述：“读书足以怡情,足以傅彩,足以长才.其怡情也,最见于独处幽居之时；其傅彩也,最见于高谈阔论之中；其长才也,最见于处世判事之际.”“读史使人明智,读诗使人灵秀,数学使人周密,科学使人深刻,伦理学使人庄重,逻辑修辞之学使人善辨,凡有所学皆成性格.”培根说：“人的天性像是野生的花草,读书像是修剪移栽.一个没有目标没有重点盲目读书的人,最终只能成为书的奴隶.”
读书方法上培根注重理论与实践相结合,“运用的方法乃在书本之外,这是一门技艺,不经实验就不能学到.”培根说：“有的书只要读其中的一部分,有的书只须知其中梗概即可,而对一些好书则要反复地读.
《培根论读书》对读书的意义、作用和方法都作了透彻的论述,今天,无论是读书治学还是掌握现代先进的科学技术,都是值得我们借鉴的.我想,做到爱读书,会读书,这样才能读好书,才能学好知识
分析
1、“读史使人明智,读诗使人聪慧,演算使人精密,哲理使人深刻,道德使人有修养,逻辑修辞使人善辩.”
“……使人……”是分述,后面的“总之,‘知识能塑造人的性格’.”是在分述的基础上归纳的结论.这种论证方法,通过叫做归纳论证.同时也运用了排比的修辞方式.这样写,增强了论述的气势,使人强烈地感受到知识对于人的作用,从而有力地论证了“知识能塑造人的性格”的论点.
2、“求知可以改进人性,而实验又可以改进知识本身.人的天性犹如野生的花草,求知学习好比修剪移栽.”
这一段以未经人工培育的“野生的花草”比喻“人的天性”,以对于野花草的“修剪移栽”比喻人的“求知学习”,两个比喻句配合得恰当而巧妙.“野生的花草”经过“修剪移栽”能花繁叶茂,“人的天性”通过“求知学习”能改进完善.运用这两句比喻是为了论证“求知可以改进人的天性”这个论点.用比喻的写法,就把比较抽象的道理,形象、生动地表达出来,易于人们感知、理解.
3、黑格尔说过：“他（培根）的著作虽然充满着最美妙、最聪明的言论,但是要理解其中的智慧,通常只需付出很少的理性努力,因此他的话常常被人拿着当作格言.”