问题描述：
英语翻译
Empirical evidence on the effects of marital status confirms these
propositions:Married persons are less likely to move than singles,and
the mobility of separated and divorced partners (others) is by far the
highest.The mobility of singles is dampened by the fact that many of them
are tied members of households headed by parents or other close relatives.
In contrast,the mobility of others is augmented by their relatively recent
change of marital status,which creates a change of locational equilibrium.
The same effect,of course,holds for newly married couples.
Evidence on lesser migration rates of families with working wives is
extensive.The deterrent effects are stronger when the wife's attachment is
more permanent and,in general,when her permanent earning power is
higher.In contrast,when families are classified by education of husband,
they are more likely to move.Educated husbands' contributions to family
income are larger,and their gains from migration are more likely to outweigh
their wives' losses.
The deterrent effect of the wife's work status increases with distance,
while the husband's education is positively related to the distance of
migration.At shorter distances (intracounty moves),wives' earnings
actually encourage more intensive search activities of husbands.According
to our analysis,where the female to male earnings ratio is higher,the
incidence of immobilized husbands increases.Consequently,local mobility
increases relative to long-distance migration.
请不要用在线翻译工具直接翻译.
Empirical evidence on the effects of marital status confirms these
propositions:Married persons are less likely to move than singles,and
the mobility of separated and divorced partners (others) is by far the
highest.The mobility of singles is dampened by the fact that many of them
are tied members of households headed by parents or other close relatives.
In contrast,the mobility of others is augmented by their relatively recent
change of marital status,which creates a change of locational equilibrium.
The same effect,of course,holds for newly married couples.
Evidence on lesser migration rates of families with working wives is
extensive.The deterrent effects are stronger when the wife's attachment is
more permanent and,in general,when her permanent earning power is
higher.In contrast,when families are classified by education of husband,
they are more likely to move.Educated husbands' contributions to family
income are larger,and their gains from migration are more likely to outweigh
their wives' losses.
The deterrent effect of the wife's work status increases with distance,
while the husband's education is positively related to the distance of
migration.At shorter distances (intracounty moves),wives' earnings
actually encourage more intensive search activities of husbands.According
to our analysis,where the female to male earnings ratio is higher,the
incidence of immobilized husbands increases.Consequently,local mobility
increases relative to long-distance migration.
请不要用在线翻译工具直接翻译.
问题解答：
我来补答展开全文阅读