问题描述：
批改作文 剑七 test2 task2
Nowadays,a hot and important contraversy concerning the problem whether the punishments for each type of crimes should be fixed.Some people contend that the consistent punishments seems to be fairer and more clearly.while a large amount proporation of people advocate that it depends on individual situation.I will present and analyde both views here.
The first plain truth Iwant to emphasize here is that every crimes has its own reasons and resutls,it can not be divided simplity from one aspect.So that the decision which considered different circumstance turns to be positive reasonable. Furthermore, with the complicate motivation and action,there has not a boundry line between two similiar commitment in current days.The flxible punishment system will not fail to be one good way to show the society that the government care about them,and thus ,the general public are able to participate more in government policy determination.Last but not least,the sdandadization of law has been improved rapidly in these years.Even two crimes lead to the same result,one's original intension to commite should be taking account to replect the regular law setup.
Admittedly,fixed punishments have some merits.Under the fixed punishment system,the law enforcement officials have definite rules to follow.The crimes will make up some excuses for themslves to get the jury's simpathy,and escape from the judgment they due to get. But with the developed law system,this problem can be solved efficiently.
In conclusion,altough fixed punishment policy has deniable advantages,I regard the flexible system as a better choice.It is the best way for us to get a clear perspevtive of what teh crimes got relied on what they have done.with such a perspective,we can own a more peaceful society.
Nowadays,a hot and important contraversy concerning the problem whether the punishments for each type of crimes should be fixed.Some people contend that the consistent punishments seems to be fairer and more clearly.while a large amount proporation of people advocate that it depends on individual situation.I will present and analyde both views here.
The first plain truth Iwant to emphasize here is that every crimes has its own reasons and resutls,it can not be divided simplity from one aspect.So that the decision which considered different circumstance turns to be positive reasonable. Furthermore, with the complicate motivation and action,there has not a boundry line between two similiar commitment in current days.The flxible punishment system will not fail to be one good way to show the society that the government care about them,and thus ,the general public are able to participate more in government policy determination.Last but not least,the sdandadization of law has been improved rapidly in these years.Even two crimes lead to the same result,one's original intension to commite should be taking account to replect the regular law setup.
Admittedly,fixed punishments have some merits.Under the fixed punishment system,the law enforcement officials have definite rules to follow.The crimes will make up some excuses for themslves to get the jury's simpathy,and escape from the judgment they due to get. But with the developed law system,this problem can be solved efficiently.
In conclusion,altough fixed punishment policy has deniable advantages,I regard the flexible system as a better choice.It is the best way for us to get a clear perspevtive of what teh crimes got relied on what they have done.with such a perspective,we can own a more peaceful society.
问题解答：
我来补答展开全文阅读