问题描述：
分数不是问题
The acknowledgement that a classified subject arrangement displaying major subject relationships and relying upon the idea of relative location,is essential in most libraries leads on to the natural question—what is the subject of a book or other item of recorded knowledge?We shall find that the classifier needs to observe rules for dealing with multi-subject works and must be ware of confusing the true subject of a book with some emphasis orbias which may be evident in a particular book’s treatment of that subject.Yet a point that can and should be grasped form the outset is that,to classify accurately and precisely,we must place each book under its specific subject,for it is only in this way that we can adequately arrange material,or entries in a classified catalogue,in a helpful sequence and can maintain that arrangement.Within each major subject field,the sequence should begin with general material and proceed slowly to more and more specialized branches of the subject,the exact order of progression being determined by an accurate analysis of the subject of books and by observing the needs of the majority of specialist readers in each field of activity,Thus a history of the town of Leeds,for example,should be classified as such and not hidden away with more general material under British history or even the history of Yorkshire.The helpful sequence of the history class should then enable a reader or enquirer to see first material on “the History of Britain” as a whole,then to survey works on the encounter specific works dealing with the history of individual towns,or even areas within towns.Each town will be subordinated to its parent county,each county to the country as a whole.Thus it is that the widening or restriction of a search becomes more easy in a well-classified library and both general (or generic) and specific searches can be made.The same procedure is followed in other subject fields,with classification being carried out precisely,or as precisely as the system in use allows,unless it is known that the library in question has deliberately opted for a policy of broad,that is less detailed classification.
金山词霸还是什么东东给翻译出来的?也太假了吧
The acknowledgement that a classified subject arrangement displaying major subject relationships and relying upon the idea of relative location,is essential in most libraries leads on to the natural question—what is the subject of a book or other item of recorded knowledge?We shall find that the classifier needs to observe rules for dealing with multi-subject works and must be ware of confusing the true subject of a book with some emphasis orbias which may be evident in a particular book’s treatment of that subject.Yet a point that can and should be grasped form the outset is that,to classify accurately and precisely,we must place each book under its specific subject,for it is only in this way that we can adequately arrange material,or entries in a classified catalogue,in a helpful sequence and can maintain that arrangement.Within each major subject field,the sequence should begin with general material and proceed slowly to more and more specialized branches of the subject,the exact order of progression being determined by an accurate analysis of the subject of books and by observing the needs of the majority of specialist readers in each field of activity,Thus a history of the town of Leeds,for example,should be classified as such and not hidden away with more general material under British history or even the history of Yorkshire.The helpful sequence of the history class should then enable a reader or enquirer to see first material on “the History of Britain” as a whole,then to survey works on the encounter specific works dealing with the history of individual towns,or even areas within towns.Each town will be subordinated to its parent county,each county to the country as a whole.Thus it is that the widening or restriction of a search becomes more easy in a well-classified library and both general (or generic) and specific searches can be made.The same procedure is followed in other subject fields,with classification being carried out precisely,or as precisely as the system in use allows,unless it is known that the library in question has deliberately opted for a policy of broad,that is less detailed classification.
金山词霸还是什么东东给翻译出来的?也太假了吧
问题解答：
我来补答展开全文阅读