问题描述：
英语翻译
Considering the Declaration on Human Cloning passed by the Legal Assembly of the United Nations,should any changes be made to the existing system?Should regulations specify exactly what the meaning of “human dignity” is,or does the Declaration,though non-binding,sufficiently cover the world’s stance on the issue?
What changes,if any,should be made to the legal process of obtaining informed consent?Do review boards need to take stronger precautions to ensure that consent is not simply asked for and received,but also fully understood by the subjects?
How can host countries and research teams ensure that neither side is expending more energy in their relationship than the other?What rights do host countries and communities have in regards to receiving treatments and technologies following trials,and who exactly is responsible for providing them?
Do placebo-controlled-trials need to be restricted,limited,or monitored in any further ways?How can host communities be further assured that placebos will not in any way hurt their overall health?
Should anything be done to promote research in the most vital and necessary areas of global health such as HIV and malaria?Is it companies’ responsibility to research particular diseases,or as private companies do they have the right to study whatever they wish?
Should any measures be taken to further ensure balanced relationships and minimize exploitation of host communities?What exactly does “reasonable availability” mean in practice,and what needs to be done to ensure its use?
不要翻译器翻译的 如果你是翻译器翻译的 就不用麻烦你了
Considering the Declaration on Human Cloning passed by the Legal Assembly of the United Nations,should any changes be made to the existing system?Should regulations specify exactly what the meaning of “human dignity” is,or does the Declaration,though non-binding,sufficiently cover the world’s stance on the issue?
What changes,if any,should be made to the legal process of obtaining informed consent?Do review boards need to take stronger precautions to ensure that consent is not simply asked for and received,but also fully understood by the subjects?
How can host countries and research teams ensure that neither side is expending more energy in their relationship than the other?What rights do host countries and communities have in regards to receiving treatments and technologies following trials,and who exactly is responsible for providing them?
Do placebo-controlled-trials need to be restricted,limited,or monitored in any further ways?How can host communities be further assured that placebos will not in any way hurt their overall health?
Should anything be done to promote research in the most vital and necessary areas of global health such as HIV and malaria?Is it companies’ responsibility to research particular diseases,or as private companies do they have the right to study whatever they wish?
Should any measures be taken to further ensure balanced relationships and minimize exploitation of host communities?What exactly does “reasonable availability” mean in practice,and what needs to be done to ensure its use?
不要翻译器翻译的 如果你是翻译器翻译的 就不用麻烦你了
问题解答：
我来补答展开全文阅读