英语翻译There was no difference between groups on the three fear

问题描述:

英语翻译
There was no difference between groups on the three fear measures,indicating that the training strategies were ineffective in reducing fire-related fears.Several factors may account for this finding.First,the sample size was small and did not exclusively consist of children who were extremely fearful of fire (n=31).The inclusion of moderately fearful children may have contributed to the undesirable outcome.More specifically,21 of the 52 children reported only a moderate level of fire-related far at pre-test.
This finding is consistent with previous investigations in which moderately fearful children made up a substantial part of the sample 8 Therefore,it is likely that only children who have extreme levels of fire-related fear will benefit from fear-reduction strategies such as rehearsal-plus.Given that having a moderate level of fear may be adaptive,fear-reduction strategies should be aimed at reducing extreme levels of fear rather than eliminating these fears completely.Finally,a possible explanation for the ineffectiveness of rehearsal-plus in reducing fear may have been the relatively brief period of the intervention.The sheer volume of information associated with this strategy may have been too rauch for children to process and to comprehend in three days.
1个回答 分类:英语 2014-10-20

问题解答:

我来补答
在对恐惧进行的三项测试的分组之间没有差别,显示出为减少火灾恐惧所指定的培训策略是无效的.有几个因素可以解释这一结果.首先,测试组的样本数量很小,而且并非仅包含对火灾极度恐惧的孩子(样本数量n=31).对火灾只有中度恐惧的孩子可能造成了这个不受欢迎的结果.更特别的是,先期测试的报告显示,52名孩子中的21人仅具有中等火灾恐惧的程度.
这一结果与过去的调查相吻合,即中等恐惧的孩子占据样本组的主要部分.因此,似乎只有那些对火灾极度恐惧的孩子才会在减少恐惧培训策略(例如强化预演培训)中受益.假设中度恐惧会产生适应效果,那么减少恐惧培训策略的目标应该是降低恐惧水平,而不是完全消除这些恐惧感.最后,强化预演培训没有效果的一种可能的解释是间隔时间相对短暂.与这一培训策略有关的全部信息太粗糙,以至于没有办法在三天内让孩子完成并理解培训的内容.
(如果哪里翻译的不易理解,就提出来,我再改.)
 
 
展开全文阅读
剩余:2000
上一页:为什么只选B
下一页:第8题练习