英语翻译1.Culture,Emotion Regulation,and AdjustmentPages 925-937

问题描述:

英语翻译
1.
Culture,Emotion Regulation,and Adjustment
Pages 925-937
David Matsumoto,Seung Hee Yoo,Sanae Nakagawa,37 Members of the Multinational Study of Cultural Display Rules
Preview PDF (211 K) | Related ArticlesAbstractAbstract | ReferencesReferencesThis article reports differences across 23 countries on 2 processes of emotion regulation––reappraisal and suppression.Cultural dimensions were correlated with country means on both and the relationship between them.Cultures that emphasized the maintenance of social order––that is,those that were long-term oriented and valued embeddedness and hierarchy––tended to have higher scores on suppression,and reappraisal and suppression tended to be positively correlated.In contrast,cultures that minimized the maintenance of social order and valued individual Affective Autonomy and Egalitarianism tended to have lower scores on Suppression,and Reappraisal and Suppression tended to be negatively correlated.Moreover,country-level emotion regulation was significantly correlated with country-level indices of both positive and negative adjustment.
2.
Affective and Cognitive Meta-Bases of Attitudes:Unique Effects on Information Interest and Persuasion
Pages 938-955
Ya Hui Michelle See,Richard E.Petty,Leandre R.Fabrigar
Preview PDF (149 K) | Related ArticlesAbstractAbstract | ReferencesReferencesThe authors investigated the predictive utility of people's subjective assessments of whether their evaluations are affect- or cognition driven (i.e.,meta-cognitive bases) as separate from whether people's attitudes are actually affect- or cognition based (i.e.,structural bases).Study 1 demonstrated that meta-bases uniquely predict interest in affective versus cognitive information above and beyond structural bases and other related variables (i.e.,need for cognition and need for affect).In Study 2,meta-bases were shown to account for unique variance in attitude change as a function of appeal type.Finally,Study 3 showed that as people became more deliberative in their judgments,meta-bases increased in predictive utility,and structural bases decreased in predictive utility.These findings support the existence of meta-bases of attitudes and demonstrate that meta-bases are distinguishable from structural bases in their predictive utility.
1个回答 分类:英语 2014-11-02

问题解答:

我来补答
文化,情绪调节,与调整
页925-937
大卫松本,柳升熙,早苗川的37多国文化的研究显示规则议员
 预览PDF格式(211金)|相关ArticlesAbstractAbstract | ReferencesReferencesThis本文报告23个国家的分歧2情绪调节过程-重新评价和镇压.文化层面的人与国家相关的手段上都和它们之间的关系.文化,强调了维护社会秩序-也就是说,那些被长期导向,重视镶嵌和层次-往往有较高的分数镇压,并重新评估和镇压往往呈正相关.相反,文化,减少了维护社会秩序和重视个人自主和平等主义的情感往往较低分数在制止和重新评价和制止往往呈负相关.此外,国家一级的情绪调节与显着相关国家的正反两方面的调整程度的指标.
文化,情绪调节,与调整
页925-937
大卫松本,柳升熙,早苗川的37多国文化的研究显示规则议员
 预览PDF格式(211金)|相关ArticlesAbstractAbstract | ReferencesReferencesThis本文报告23个国家的分歧2情绪调节过程-重新评价和镇压.文化层面的人与国家相关的手段上都和它们之间的关系.文化,强调了维护社会秩序-也就是说,那些被长期导向,重视镶嵌和层次-往往有较高的分数镇压,并重新评估和镇压往往呈正相关.相反,文化,减少社会情感和认知元维修基地的态度:独特的信息的兴趣和说服效果
页938-955
亚惠米歇尔见,理查德E佩蒂,莱昂德尔河Fabrigar
 预览PDF格式(149金)|相关ArticlesAbstractAbstract | ReferencesReferencesThe作者调查了他们的评价是否会影响人们的主观评估,预测工具或驱动(即元认知基地)从是否作为单独的人的态度是,实际上影响或认知的认知基于(即结构性基地).研究表明,1元基地独特的预测情感与认知上述信息的兴趣和以后的结构基础及其他相关变量(即对认知和影响稳定的需要).在研究2,元基地,却显示出了占态度独特的差异作为上诉类型的功能变化.最后,研究3表明,随着人们变得更加慎重,在他们的判断,元基地,增加了预测的效用,并在预测的基础结构公用事业下降.这些发现支持元存在基地和态度表明,元基地在他们的预测效用结构基地区分.
给的分确实有点……
 
 
展开全文阅读
剩余:2000