翻译一段法律案例Reward!the government of western Australiaoffered a

问题描述:

翻译一段法律案例
Reward!the government of western Australiaoffered a reward:”1000 for such information as shall lead to the arrest and conviction of the person or persons who committed the murders” of an inspector and a sergeant of police.
the notice also provided for a free pardon to any accomplice, not being the person who actually committed the murders,who would give the information.
x and evan Clarke were arrested and charged with the murders but shortly afterwards Clarke gave information which led to the arrest of y, x, and y were convicted.
Clarke,who ded nit commit the murders, was unsuccessful in claiming the reward after his release on the basis that he gave the information to cleat himself of murder and not in reliance upon the reward:
"Clarke had seen the offer,indeed; but it was not present to his mind - he had forgotten it, and gave no consideration to it ,in his intecse excitement as to his own danger.There cannot be assent without knowledge of the offer; and ignorance of the offer is the same thing whether it is due to never hearing of it or to forgetting it after hearing."
1个回答 分类:英语 2014-10-01

问题解答:

我来补答
西澳大利亚政府发布悬赏令:“凡有人能够提供有助于逮捕、定罪谋杀一检查员和一个警官的人或犯罪团体的消息,将被悬赏1000美金”.
公告还说可以赦免那些提供犯罪信息却没有实际参与谋杀的从犯.
x和艾凡克拉克被逮捕并被指控犯有谋杀罪,但不久克拉克坦白,提供信息协助警方逮捕y、x,并且y被判刑.
克拉克并没有参与谋杀,他被释放之后却没有成功认领悬赏,因为他虽然有提供信息但是他自己也被牵扯进了这宗谋杀案,因此他没有权利获得该奖励.
“事实上,克拉克曾经看过这个悬赏,但这对于他来说并不是礼物,他已经忘记了它,也没有在意它,他的兴奋喜悦就像他面临的危险一样.没人赞同不知道悬赏和忽视悬赏是相同的事情—不管是否是因为从未听过它或是在听过之后忘记了.”
文章里的错误:第一行 应该是Australia offered
第八行 应该是who did not
第11行 应该是intense
再问: 请问你是法律专业的吗?案例分析要如何分析呢?可以指导一二吗 我不是法律专业的 谢谢
再答: 我也不是法律专业的
 
 
展开全文阅读
剩余:2000
下一页:fx的解析式