问题描述：
翻译汉译英,不要google或者有道的在线翻译,那个太不靠谱了
中国《刑法》独树一帜的从积极、消极两个方面定义罪刑法定,导致在刑法实践过程当中保障人权和秩序维护两种价值目标产生冲突,并由此产生形式罪刑法定与实质罪刑法定主义之争.类推适用作为其中的关键“战场”,在与罪刑法定博弈的过程中却始终没有形成终局性的结论.而资产阶级革命初期所认同的罪刑法定与类推适用的绝对对立排斥,经过历史实践已经为现代许多国家摒弃.刑事责任作为一种最为严格的法律责任,它直接涉及对当事人的重大权益的剥夺、限制,完全可以由强大的国家做出让步,将法律的模糊、空白地带朝有利于当事人的方向偏移.
问题解答：
我来补答
China "Criminal law" establishes a new school from positive,the negative two aspects defines the crime criminal law to decide,causes the assurance of human rights and the order maintains two kind of value goals in the middle of the criminal law practice process to have the conflict,and has the form crime criminal law to decide from this with the substantive crime criminal law decides struggle of the principle.The analogy takes key suitably “the battlefield”,in decides gambling with the crime criminal law in the process actually throughout not to form the result conclusion.But the bourgeois revolution initial period approves the crime criminal law decided with the analogy suitable absolute opposition repels,undergoes the historical practice already for the modern many country rejections.The legal responsibility takes one kind of strictest legal liability,it involves directly to litigant's significant rights and interests eliminates,the limit,definitely may make the concessions by the formidable country,the law fuzzy,the blank region toward is advantageous to litigant's direction displacement.
