问题描述:
雅思的作文求高手指导!,最好给个评分急谢谢了.
Should governments spend money on art,when they have so many other important issues and concerns?You should use your own ideas of knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
Nowadays,the art plays increasingly important role in peoples daily life spiritually and culturally due to improvement of living standard on average.Naturally,some people believe that governments should stick to invest sufficient money regularly into developing the art industry regardless of many severe problems have not been addressed yet.Personally I partly agree with the opinion expressed above.
Admittedly,there are some benefits can be provided by art in terms of individuals leisure time.Generally speaking,it is imperative that people relax their bodies and easy their minds after working or studying by appreciating the art.For instance ,the movie as one of the most prevalent art item,may occupies many individuals most of spare time.In addition to this,the music tend be be the second well-liked one in peoples recreational way,usually we can listen to music without time,place restriction and keeping the good mond to some extend.As a consequence,governments spend money in art for the sake of individuals needs which might be crucial.
On the other hand,there are various aspects against these viewpoints.It is surely to say the art cannot deal with such problems in terms of education,medicine,homelessness etc immediately .Indeed ,no one can deny the value of art,but if there are a vast number of impoverished people from different countries are living in misery,what kind of role that the art play in those people?.Furthermore,due to restricted investment of government revenue,if governments invest enormous money in development of art items and then the investment related to other serious issues might be diminished.
In conclution,the art is certainly bring about some benefits for people,particularly relieving individuals presure.I would say that investment of art is necessary ,but it does not mean governments should fund art areas without financial limit.It is better for governments give priority to take other urgent issues into account and exploring all avenues to deal with these proplems.
Should governments spend money on art,when they have so many other important issues and concerns?You should use your own ideas of knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
Nowadays,the art plays increasingly important role in peoples daily life spiritually and culturally due to improvement of living standard on average.Naturally,some people believe that governments should stick to invest sufficient money regularly into developing the art industry regardless of many severe problems have not been addressed yet.Personally I partly agree with the opinion expressed above.
Admittedly,there are some benefits can be provided by art in terms of individuals leisure time.Generally speaking,it is imperative that people relax their bodies and easy their minds after working or studying by appreciating the art.For instance ,the movie as one of the most prevalent art item,may occupies many individuals most of spare time.In addition to this,the music tend be be the second well-liked one in peoples recreational way,usually we can listen to music without time,place restriction and keeping the good mond to some extend.As a consequence,governments spend money in art for the sake of individuals needs which might be crucial.
On the other hand,there are various aspects against these viewpoints.It is surely to say the art cannot deal with such problems in terms of education,medicine,homelessness etc immediately .Indeed ,no one can deny the value of art,but if there are a vast number of impoverished people from different countries are living in misery,what kind of role that the art play in those people?.Furthermore,due to restricted investment of government revenue,if governments invest enormous money in development of art items and then the investment related to other serious issues might be diminished.
In conclution,the art is certainly bring about some benefits for people,particularly relieving individuals presure.I would say that investment of art is necessary ,but it does not mean governments should fund art areas without financial limit.It is better for governments give priority to take other urgent issues into account and exploring all avenues to deal with these proplems.
问题解答:
我来补答展开全文阅读