For most people,shopping is still a matter of wandering down

问题描述:

For most people,shopping is still a matter of wandering down the high street or loading a cart ...
For most people,shopping is still a matter of wandering down the high street or loading a cart in a shopping mall.Soon, that will change.Electronic commerce is growing fast and will soon bring people more choice.There will,however,be a cost:protecting the consumer from fraud will be harder.Many governments therefore want to extend highstreet regulations to the electronic world.But politicians would be wiser to see cyberspace as a basis for a new era of corporate self-regulation.
  Consumers in rich countries have grown used to the idea that the government takes responsibility for everything from the stability of the banks to the safety of the drugs,or their rights to refund(退款) when goods are faulty.But governments cannot enforce national laws on businesses whose only presence in their country is on the screen.Other countries have regulators,but the rules of consumer protection differ,as does enforcement.Even where a clear right to compensation exists,the online catalogue customer in Tokyo,say,can hardly go to New York to extract a refund for a dud purchase.
  One answer is for governments to cooperate more:to recognize each other’s rules.But that requires years of work and volumes of detailed rules.And plenty of countries have rules too fanciful for sober states to accept.There is,however,an alternative.Let the electronic businesses do the “regulation” themselves.They do,after all,have a self-interest in doing so.
  In electronic commerce,a reputation for honest dealing will be a valuable competitive asset.Governments,too,may compete to be trusted.For instance,customers ordering medicines online may prefer to buy from the United States because they trust the rigorous screening of the Food and Drug Administration; or they may decide that the FDA’s rules are too strict,and buy from Switzerland instead.
  Consumers will need to use their judgment.But precisely because the technology is new,electronic shoppers are likely for a while to be a lot more cautious than consumers of the normal sort---and the new technology will also make it easier for them to complain noisily when a company lets them down.In this way,at least,the advent of cyberspace may argue for fewer consumer protection laws,not more.求翻译啊.
1个回答 分类:英语 2014-12-08

问题解答:

我来补答
  对大多数人来说,购物仍然是一个问题的漫游的高街或装载了一辆手推车一个购物中心.不久,情况将会改变.电子商务的迅速发展,很快就会带给人更多的选择.有,但是要付出代价:保护消费者从舞弊会很艰难.许多政府因此想扩大了规定highstreet电子世界.但政客们变得更聪明看网络为基础,企业自律的一个新时代的开始.
  消费者在发达国家已经习惯于认为政府负责一切从银行的稳定安全的药物,或他们的权利,当货物退(退款)是有缺点的.但政府不能执行国家法律对企业生存的唯一出现在他们的国家是在屏幕上.其他国家的监管机构,但消费者保护的规则相异,并执行.即使在一个清晰的权利补偿存在,在线目录客户在东京,说,很难去纽约提取退款,为一个无用的人购买.
  
  一个答案是让政府给予更多地配合:认识到对方的规则.但这需要多年的努力和大量的详细的规则.和许多国家已经太稀奇的清醒状态的规则去接受.然而,一种选择.让电子企业《条例》本身.他们做的,毕竟,有一个自我,这样做.
  在电子商务、清正廉洁的名声首度将是一个有价值的有竞争力的资产.政府也可能竞争可以信赖的人.例如,客户在线订购药物可能更愿意购买美国,因为他们相信严格筛选的食品和药物管理局;或者他们可能会决定,FDA的规则太严格,买来自瑞士代替.
  
  消费者将需要使用他们的判断.而恰恰因为技术是新的,电子购物时,可能会有更多的谨慎的正常类消费者的新技术———也会让他们更容易抱怨大声地当一个公司让他们失望.通过这种方式,至少,网络的出现可能开始怀疑为消费者保护法更少,而不是更多.
 
 
展开全文阅读
剩余:2000
上一页:100 ,11
下一页:29