问题描述：
英语翻译
标题∶郑和“贻铃”史实辨析
摘要∶陈第的《东番记》,自明万历卅一年（1603）问世至民国初这300余年间,曾被十多部史籍文献转引.其中《闽海赠言》为全文刊载,余者大多是引述郑和“贻铃”这段典故.由此可见,“贻铃”是《东番记》中至关重要的一段记述.但由于“贻铃”中陡然一句“家贻一铜铃,使颈之盖狗之也”,令后人在解读上徒增了“贻铃”究竟是否表示“狗也”之疑惑.因之,明清以来不断有学者对“狗也”采取了回避态度或质疑.本文在介绍现有成果的同时,着重探究了郑和在“与日本交涉、招谕海外诸番”过程中,前往东番人住地（走访不遇后）“贻铃”这一实质；并就“贻铃”与“狗也”,“狗国”与“和恶之”等有争议的论点展开了探讨.
关键词：陈第 东番记 郑和 贻铃 狗也 辨析
以下恶意回答!
问题解答：
我来补答
For over 300 years,from the 31st year of the reign of Emperior Wanli,Ming Dynasty (1603),"An Account of the Eastern Barbarians" (《东番记》),written by Chen-di (陈第),has been a literary term for historical reference on many accounts.Amongst these references,"Bequeath to the coastal Fujian" (《闽海赠言》) has quoted the whole original text,while other quotes give an account of the bell-gift anecdote.Thus,it can be seen that the bell-gift is an important anecdote in "An Account of the Eastern Barbarians" .However,it is said in the anecdote,"left a bell for Pasai as a gift for wearing around the neck,like dogs".It leaves so much room for interpretation - whether the bell gift is meant to be demeaningful,treating Pasai like a pet dog.Therefore,since the Ming Dynasty,many scholars have doubts about the "dog" reference and chosen to avoid interpreting same.While this paper presents the findings of this anecdote,it reviews Zheng-he's mission to resolve the territorial disputes with Japan and to subdue the eastern barbarians.This paper provides for an in-depth examination of the anecdote and its controversy - whether leaving the bell-gift after failing to meet with Pasai has any real claim,whether the bell-gift signifies a "name-calling" insult,whether the naming of "dog country" and "showing hostile attitude" has any real evidence.
Keywords:Chen-di,"An Account of the Eastern Barbarians",Zheng-he,bell-gift,dog,analysis
