问题描述：
英语翻译
MMPA Summer 2008
Macroeconomics
Assignment # 3
Answers to be handed in before 9 am,Thursday July 31.ANSWERS POSTED AFTER THAT WILL HAVE MARKS TAKEN OFF FOR LATENESS,TWO MARKS PER DAY.
INDICATE CLEARLY YOUR NAMES AND STUDENT NUMBERS.
Work in a new two-person team.
In CASE1,the target rate of inflation is 4.0%.But the government wants to explore the implications of reducing inflation to 2.0%.In ALT1,explore this option by using monetary policy (in SETUP,set cell F13 to 2.00,with cell F15 set at 0).But the government’s backbenchers are very concerned about weakening the economy during the transition,and are recommending that the government reduce the personal income tax (PIT) rate from 24% to 22% as a way of easing the pain.Implement this in ALT2 (i.e.set G13 at 2.00,G7 at 22.00,and G15 at 0.)
Opposition spokesmen think that rather than cutting income taxes,a preferable policy would be to accompany the reduction in inflation with a cut in the indirect tax rate instead of the personal income tax rate.Explore this in ALT3 (set H13 at 2.00,H9 at 6.00 and H15 at 0.)
Explain what happens to the real short-term interest rate,the nominal exchange rate,the nominal short-term interest rate,exports,and personal income tax revenue in each of the three alternative scenarios as compared to each other and CASE1.
Which of ALT1 or ALT2 would you recommend to the government,and why?
(do not concern yourself with any implications beyond period 24).
请给出翻译,..高分在向你挥手,先翻先得...
MMPA 2008夏季 宏观经济学作业
答案于7月31日上午九点前递交。迟交一天扣除两分。写清姓名和学号。
重新结成两人小组。
在案例1中，目标通胀率是4.0%。但政府想要探究把通胀率降至2.0%的影响(意义)。在方案（可能性）1中用现行政策研究这一选择（在设置中把cell F13设为2.00，cell F15设为0）。但下院普通议员担心转型期经济衰弱，并推荐政府将个人所得税税率由24% 降为 22%以缓解压力。完成方案2（比如将G13设为2.00，G7设为22.00，G15为0）
反对方发言人认为，与其调低个人所得税率，不如在降低通货膨胀的同时削减间接税的税率。在方案2中研究这一政策（将H13设为2.00，H9设为6.00，H15为0）
解释现实短期利率，名义交易率，名义短期利率，出口和个人所得税在这三个方案中如何变化。相互比较并参考案例1.
你会向政府推荐方案1和2中哪一个？（不要受24段外其它暗示的影响）
这是我的翻译,为了稳妥起见,因此想找人代翻对比参照一下...
..最高分加20吧...呵呵
MMPA Summer 2008
Macroeconomics
Assignment # 3
Answers to be handed in before 9 am,Thursday July 31.ANSWERS POSTED AFTER THAT WILL HAVE MARKS TAKEN OFF FOR LATENESS,TWO MARKS PER DAY.
INDICATE CLEARLY YOUR NAMES AND STUDENT NUMBERS.
Work in a new two-person team.
In CASE1,the target rate of inflation is 4.0%.But the government wants to explore the implications of reducing inflation to 2.0%.In ALT1,explore this option by using monetary policy (in SETUP,set cell F13 to 2.00,with cell F15 set at 0).But the government’s backbenchers are very concerned about weakening the economy during the transition,and are recommending that the government reduce the personal income tax (PIT) rate from 24% to 22% as a way of easing the pain.Implement this in ALT2 (i.e.set G13 at 2.00,G7 at 22.00,and G15 at 0.)
Opposition spokesmen think that rather than cutting income taxes,a preferable policy would be to accompany the reduction in inflation with a cut in the indirect tax rate instead of the personal income tax rate.Explore this in ALT3 (set H13 at 2.00,H9 at 6.00 and H15 at 0.)
Explain what happens to the real short-term interest rate,the nominal exchange rate,the nominal short-term interest rate,exports,and personal income tax revenue in each of the three alternative scenarios as compared to each other and CASE1.
Which of ALT1 or ALT2 would you recommend to the government,and why?
(do not concern yourself with any implications beyond period 24).
请给出翻译,..高分在向你挥手,先翻先得...
MMPA 2008夏季 宏观经济学作业
答案于7月31日上午九点前递交。迟交一天扣除两分。写清姓名和学号。
重新结成两人小组。
在案例1中，目标通胀率是4.0%。但政府想要探究把通胀率降至2.0%的影响(意义)。在方案（可能性）1中用现行政策研究这一选择（在设置中把cell F13设为2.00，cell F15设为0）。但下院普通议员担心转型期经济衰弱，并推荐政府将个人所得税税率由24% 降为 22%以缓解压力。完成方案2（比如将G13设为2.00，G7设为22.00，G15为0）
反对方发言人认为，与其调低个人所得税率，不如在降低通货膨胀的同时削减间接税的税率。在方案2中研究这一政策（将H13设为2.00，H9设为6.00，H15为0）
解释现实短期利率，名义交易率，名义短期利率，出口和个人所得税在这三个方案中如何变化。相互比较并参考案例1.
你会向政府推荐方案1和2中哪一个？（不要受24段外其它暗示的影响）
这是我的翻译,为了稳妥起见,因此想找人代翻对比参照一下...
..最高分加20吧...呵呵
问题解答：
我来补答展开全文阅读