问题描述：
分析两个句子.
又劳烦您帮忙了
为了能更好理解句子,打出短文
I am writing to say that I am against building a new zoo in our town.Zoos are terrible places for animals to live.I've visited a lot of zoos in my life,and I have never seen one I liked or one that was suitable for animals to live in.Just last week,I visited a zoo and couldn't believe what I saw.The animals are kept in tiny cages and can hardly move at all.And they are only given once a day.Is this a good way for animals to live?I don't think so.
本文第二句,第三句的末尾都有live出现,但是前者后无介词,后者有介词,对于这个问题目前有两种看法：
1.词义不同：前者表示生活所以根本无需介词,后者表示居住自然存在介词
2.前者原本有介词,但由于之前有"place"的特殊性,后面的不定式后的介词省略了
究竟哪个正确啊
又劳烦您帮忙了
为了能更好理解句子,打出短文
I am writing to say that I am against building a new zoo in our town.Zoos are terrible places for animals to live.I've visited a lot of zoos in my life,and I have never seen one I liked or one that was suitable for animals to live in.Just last week,I visited a zoo and couldn't believe what I saw.The animals are kept in tiny cages and can hardly move at all.And they are only given once a day.Is this a good way for animals to live?I don't think so.
本文第二句,第三句的末尾都有live出现,但是前者后无介词,后者有介词,对于这个问题目前有两种看法：
1.词义不同：前者表示生活所以根本无需介词,后者表示居住自然存在介词
2.前者原本有介词,但由于之前有"place"的特殊性,后面的不定式后的介词省略了
究竟哪个正确啊
问题解答：
我来补答展开全文阅读