问题描述：
英语翻译
中国某工艺品厂长期与美国贸易公司进行工艺品交易,1996年3月10日,工艺品（以下称A厂）电告贸易公司（B厂）,以CIF条件向对方出口一批工艺品,总价值30万美元,用不可撤销的跟单信用证付款.3月15日B厂复电,提出降价至27万美元,A厂经研究同意B厂要求,遂于3月19日发电报通知B厂.3月20日B厂收到电报.随后A厂将货物运到宁波港交由某运输公司C承运.整批货物分别装入两个集装箱,并吊装到船上.4月4日承运船舶行至公海上时,由于船长疏忽,船上发生火灾.其中一个集装箱被火烧毁,另一个完好无损.5月初,货物运至旧金山.B厂拒绝接收货物,并向A厂提出索赔,双方诉至中国某法院.问CIF的海上风险到底是买方承担还是卖放承担?
问题解答：
我来补答
The Chinese some handicraft product plant manager expects to carry on the handicraft product bargain, March 10 in 1996 with American trading company, the handicraft product( call the A factory as follows) electricity tells the trading company( B factory), exporting a batch of handicraft products toward the other party with the condition of CIF, total and worth USD 300,000, use can't cancel of with single letter of credit payment.The B factory restoration of electricity on March 15, put forward reducing price to USD 270,000, the A factory was agree by research the B factory request, hence send telegram to notify the B factory on March 19.The B factory receives the telegram on March 20.Later on the A factory carry goods rather a harbor hand over to be accepted the luck by the some conveyance company C.The lot goods packs into 2 to gather to pack respectively, and mourn to pack on the boat.While accepting to carry the ships to go to the open sea on April 4, because the captain neglect, taking place a fire on the boat.An among thoses gather to pack to be destroy by fire by the fire, the another is intact to have no 损 .5 beginning of the months, the goods carry to San Francisco.The B factory brush-off receives the goods, and put forward the claim toward A factory, the both parties tell to the Chinese some court.Does the sea risk that asks the CIF is it the buyer that undertake to still sell to put to undertake exactly?
